From this place we called, repeatedly, the regulation of advertising official, especially regarding its distribution, arbitrary irrational, qualify as Human Rights Watch, Reporters Without Borders, and also our own Supreme Court. But exponential growth in .
Policy Reform enacted during the Kirchnerism has introduced major changes in the regulation of advertising for electoral purposes: namely, political parties can not hire public advertising, but it is the State distributed by lot, such media space, taking into account the votes in recent elections. From an idealistic standpoint, consider that it could be well-intentioned rule limiting funding of political parties at private companies.
But it is the combination of two factors, namely the lack of regulation of advertising and the precise and strict regulation of election advertising, which shows the real Kirchnerism depth, and its hidden intention .
The direct consequence of non-regulation of advertising is that the allocated Kirchnerism $ 512 million a year (or $ 1.5 million per day) to spread (however) his voice, with no restrictions except closed two weeks before the election in October. Outside this limit, no restriction for Kirchnerism.
By contrast, the Opposition parties can not freely guidelines, and will have restricted access to the media. In case the 445 regulatory decree implies that the schedule most viewers ( prime time) only 10% focus on electoral advertising space .
What is said, a truly great goal of the ruling. The Baldwin ensures complete freedom to schedule and how you want terms, but applies to all other parties Ridiger limitations.
corollary of this new display of resiliency Kirchner: the parsimony of the Opposition political parties that fail to anticipate these movements. Question: when negotiating the Media Law and Policy Reform, "could not change the regulation to require government advertising?
----------------------
0 comments:
Post a Comment