I Went To Open Lots Of Shops

An easy solution to the issue of State directors in private companies


Where appropriate, we might agree that the representation vote relates to the state shareholder equity. World examples abound, and the blogosphere is tired of ruling point out.

But that's not the focus of the debate .

Anses's ownership interest in about 50 companies was inherited from the AFJPs , eliminated by the law that prompted the Kirchnerism 26,425. We said before in the Act which sanctioned Kirchnerism was established to maintain the limit of 5% representation on the board of these companies, as governed during the period of existence of the AFJPs.

private companies negotiated with the AFJPs, not ANSES Diego Bossio. The question is would they have accepted these state shareholding companies have known that not respect the top 5%? impossible to know now. Unless, of course, to give them a chance to prove it.

The solution, therefore, would give private companies the opportunity to repurchase actions, and decide on their own if they have a government shareholder representation (without stop) in the Directory.

Directors participation imposed by the State would be one of the requirements of eligible funds to state companies should accept.

But the current situation in no way reflects that decision. ANSES imposed by the weight of their actions inherited from the AFJPs, new rules exist at the time of retirement funds Traded Funds . -----------------