In October 2008, boosted Kirchnerism the nationalization of funds retirement that were in hand of the administrators, entities created by enactment of law Argentine Congress Peronist majority in the 90's.
A year earlier, the Kirchnerism had restored the possibility for each contributor to return to sharing system. Few did: while 1.2 million people chose to cast more than 9 million eligible stay at the Pension Funds.
But a year later, the Kirchnerism ignored choice they had made the 9 million workers, and charged ( funds) AFJP.
26,425 law Driving the final nationalization of the administrators, the Kirchnerism was forced to cede as part of the negotiation in Congress, and should be limited to 5% state participation in the voting on the boards of companies with state stake.
Today, by Decree of Necessity and Urgency 441/11, Cristina Kirchner ordered the removal expresses the limit of 5% which described in subsection F of Law 26,425. The state is enabled, then a greater say in the Directory of the 40 shareholding companies inherited from the AFJPs.
If we recognize that the top 5% was part of the negotiation by the sanction of the law of nationalization, is hardly advisable to repeal this subsection by PEN decretazo . Had to resort to a law, and explain the fundamentals leading to the need to increase state involvement , before he had agreed to hold less than 5% .
Clearly Forms care is not Directory Kirchner. The constant contradictions faced by the Kirchnerism actions imply, well, his eager call of power and control no matter what.
not forget that public enemy number 1 Kirchnerism (no, not talking about poverty or inflation, but only the wayward and former partner Grupo ClarÃn) poseee 9% of its shares in state hands. through here passes thing.
Pd. Finally habemus register again.
0 comments:
Post a Comment