I read this article Be Doulas and I found a very nice article and think about the issue of caesarean section and the significance of each woman gives to the situation that not all is equal.
Some moms call for a cesarean sometimes decided by the doctor and other times it is necessary realmete. Anyway, time is a significant and marks a before and after, mainly for the birth of a child, but also how traumatic the situation.
TRAUMA The meaning is:
- lasting injury caused by a mechanical agent, generally external.
- emotional shock that causes lasting damage to the unconscious.
- Emotion or negative impression, strong and durable.
marking .. A caesarean section in the body and therefore in the ALMA .... will be ready to begin to heal ...
Caesarea: conviction or experience?For Being Doulas
We've all heard and said some time around: "depends on the eye of the beholder" when we referred to a situation over which vision may be variable depending on who the analysis. So what for some can be a fatal sentence them a negative mark on your future, for others it is an experience you will learn when they are concerned.
Something happens with C-sections. Are performed each year in our country thousands of them to bring the world to other many children. In many cases the need prevailing due to medical reasons unanswerable. But other motives that encourage a baby comes into the arms of his mother through a major surgery rather than through a vaginal birth have little or nothing to do with preserving the physical integrity of Mom and / or baby.
Whatever the reasons and justifications given in each case, the most common is that caesarean section is traumatic for mother and baby and it involves a "conviction" to a new cesarean deliveries in the following that woman may have .
and talk about something traumatic for mom because is. Starting with the primary instinct of reproduction that our species has and for which our body is prepared. Break with the physiological function, we deprive our body to carry it out. Deprive our body's hormonal balance that triggers emotional behavior that makes us recognize our baby and love him from the start. And this can cause, sometimes a detachment behavior of initial or continuing to your baby. It's something that many women have been referred.
What about the baby? Is it really, as they say, less traumatic for babies to reach without passing through the birth canal? Nobody in their right mind can deny that passage through the birth canal is a stressful experience. But nature does nothing to chance. Our babies are born so immature to pass precisely through the birth canal. In it, still attached to their mothers, benefit from the hormonal rush they get from them to start their lives abroad. Still receiving oxygen through the umbilical cord until they are ready to breathe his own lungs, which are emptied by the "pushing" at its output suffered vaginal, besides going to be vigorously stimulated by them as well.
When we went through a traumatic time we each have our defense mechanisms, our tools to rebuild that which changes or breaks within. And these tools depend on many factors. It is therefore not surprising that similar situations, two people react very differently.
The issue at hand (caesarean) those women who feel traumatized by the experience (not far from all) also react differently. Thus we find women who accept the conviction of receiving the rest of their children the same way and try to assume that this will happen to afford more children. And we also found women who decide that things are not to be so, that there may be other options and investigate. Looking answers to their questions, they reveal themselves to what they consider a punishment. And sometimes they get it, get the birth they wanted for their next baby.
Indeed, it is a wrongful conviction. Today it is known all too well that a vaginal birth after two cesareans even fewer risks to mother and baby than a new cesarean section. So why is the conviction continues to women after their first caesarean? Is it perhaps fear of what may happen during labor? These people continue to standardize and their births? Is the desire to control and define routines will apply for comfort of our health system? Is it perhaps the desire not to lose prominence against a physiological role that women can be done without intervention if all goes as normal? What are we afraid? What prevents us from assuming the role character of women in childbirth? What prevents us from giving them the decisions about her body?
All women who have felt their cesarean as physical trauma and / or psychological need to find their own way. Maybe take them to a new cesarean section, repeat not experience motherhood and decide not to have children or a vaginal delivery as they wanted. But each will seek answers to their questions, tools to help them heal their wounds and people who stand with you in that process of healing. Will our society to the task?
0 comments:
Post a Comment